<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>QuickBooks for Contractors blog &#187; federal contractors</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.sunburstsoftwaresolutions.com/tag/federal-contractors/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.sunburstsoftwaresolutions.com</link>
	<description>by Sunburst Software Solutions, Inc.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 13:31:25 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Federal Contractors EEO-1 Filing Due But VETS-100 and 100A Delayed</title>
		<link>http://blog.sunburstsoftwaresolutions.com/2011/09/14/federal-contractors-eeo-1-filing-due-but-vets-100-and-100a-delayed/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.sunburstsoftwaresolutions.com/2011/09/14/federal-contractors-eeo-1-filing-due-but-vets-100-and-100a-delayed/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 14 Sep 2011 11:09:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Smyth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Construction News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[100a]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[eeo]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employee]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employment law]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equal employment opportunities commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[equal employment opportunity commission]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Federal]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal contract compliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal contractor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[filing]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[office of federal contract compliance programs]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[race and ethnicity]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united states]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[united states department of labor]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[vets]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.sunburstsoftwaresolutions.com/?p=2606</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_" addthis:url='http://blog.sunburstsoftwaresolutions.com/2011/09/14/federal-contractors-eeo-1-filing-due-but-vets-100-and-100a-delayed/' addthis:title='Federal Contractors EEO-1 Filing Due But VETS-100 and 100A Delayed ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>If you have 100 or more employees or are a federal contractor, you likely must file the EEO-1, VETS-100, or VETS-100A forms.  Find out what your obligations are and why the VETS reporting has been delayed<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style" addthis:url='http://blog.sunburstsoftwaresolutions.com/2011/09/14/federal-contractors-eeo-1-filing-due-but-vets-100-and-100a-delayed/' addthis:title='Federal Contractors EEO-1 Filing Due But VETS-100 and 100A Delayed ' ><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium" ></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.sunburstsoftwaresolutions.com/2011/09/14/federal-contractors-eeo-1-filing-due-but-vets-100-and-100a-delayed/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>White House Delays rule requiring electronic verification</title>
		<link>http://blog.sunburstsoftwaresolutions.com/2009/04/28/white-house-delays-rule-requiring-electronic-verification/</link>
		<comments>http://blog.sunburstsoftwaresolutions.com/2009/04/28/white-house-delays-rule-requiring-electronic-verification/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 28 Apr 2009 15:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Nancy Smyth</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA["Stuff" that drives me insane]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Construction News]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[e-verify]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[federal contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government contractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[government subcontractors]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[immigration]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.certifiedpayrollreports.com/?p=177</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style addthis_" addthis:url='http://blog.sunburstsoftwaresolutions.com/2009/04/28/white-house-delays-rule-requiring-electronic-verification/' addthis:title='White House Delays rule requiring electronic verification ' ><a class="addthis_button_preferred_1"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_2"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_3"></a><a class="addthis_button_preferred_4"></a><a class="addthis_button_compact"></a></div>The White House has postponed until June 30 the deadline for compliance with the E-Verify rule that will apply to government contractors and subcontractors. The decision gives the Obama administration more time to review the rule, which would require government contractors and subs to use an electronic system to check whether their employees are eligible to work in the U.S. The system has been modified to increase the accuracy of employment verification, according to testimony of the acting deputy director of the U.S. Citizenship and Immigrations Services.<div class="addthis_toolbox addthis_default_style" addthis:url='http://blog.sunburstsoftwaresolutions.com/2009/04/28/white-house-delays-rule-requiring-electronic-verification/' addthis:title='White House Delays rule requiring electronic verification ' ><a class="addthis_button_google_plusone" g:plusone:size="medium" ></a><a class="addthis_counter addthis_pill_style"></a></div>]]></description>
		<wfw:commentRss>http://blog.sunburstsoftwaresolutions.com/2009/04/28/white-house-delays-rule-requiring-electronic-verification/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

