New Hampshire Considers In-State Bidding Preference

News to share from Mike Purdy’s Public Contracting Blog.

A task force of the New Hampshire legislature is examining whether the state should adopt bidding preferences for New Hampshire firms competing against out-of-state firms on state contracts. The task force will report their recommendations on December 1, 2010.

Low Bid: Current New Hampshire law calls for officials to award contracts based only on the lowest price.
Reciprocal Laws May Hurt NH Firms: Some New Hampshire officials have expressed concerns about the state adopting an in-state preference because of the negative impact it may have on New Hampshire firms bidding in other states.  Most states have adopted a reciprocal preference law that calls for adding to an out-of-state firm’s bid a percentage equal to the amount of the preference that firm would receive in its own state.  For a list of states with reciprocal preference laws, visit the website of the Oregon State Procurement Office.
Tie-Bid Preference Approved: As a step toward approving in-state preference, New Hampshire requires, as of September 18, 2010, that a contract to be awarded to an in-state firm for certain contracts if the price is the same as that offered by an out-of-state firm.  Ties in bids, however, do not occur very frequently.
To read an article about the subject from the Union Leader, click here.

One thought on “New Hampshire Considers In-State Bidding Preference

  • New Hampshire Considers In-State Bidding Preference | QuickBooks … | New hampshire

    […] New Hampshire Considers In-State Bidding Preference | QuickBooks … […]

Comments are closed.